The Local Vocal

The voice for Singapore media and its idiosyncracies

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Uneducated taxi driver

I do not know how some of these bastards can ever become cab drivers. Read this report in the Straits Times forum. I know it is true because I have come across some of these bastards myself.

Cabby made a big scene although it was the taxi phone operator who made destination mistake

WITH reference to the recent announcements on increases in cab fares, I would like to recount a dreadful encounter I just had with a cab driver.
I would like to know if the relevant cab operators have a response in terms of how standards of service may also be corrected to correspond with the higher rates passengers have to pay.

I was waiting in line at the cab stand at Clarke Quay in River Valley Road on Oct 13 at around 10pm. As the queue was very long, I tried calling three different lines (some of which got disconnected even after they have established my pick-up location and destination) to book a cab. It was only about an hour later that I managed to get a booking from SMRT but my nightmare had only just begun.

By the time the cab driver called me on my mobile phone, I was already reaching the start of the queue but thought I would just leave the line to honour the booking. Imagine my dismay when I realised that the operator had gotten my destination wrong. Faced with an unhappy situation of either being taken to a place which is less than a quarter of the way to my home or rejoining the queue, I decided to call the cab operator, refusing to leave the cab until the mistake had been resolved.

The cab driver, who should have tried to resolve this problem, being part of the organisation that had made the mistake, was evidently unhappy about my choice of action and barked at me to get off his cab, alternating his rants with orders to get the cab operator to call him. He also made it a point to state that his commitment was to his next appointment and not to me, a customer whose time his organisation had wasted.

I spent at least 20 minutes on the phone with the cab operator, who, in all fairness, tried to resolve the problem. Throughout the entire time, I was subjected to yellings from the cab driver, who went as far as to open the passenger door and shout at me to get out. He stopped at times to argue with the bystanders (most of whom were foreigners) who had tried to intercede on my behalf. 'Whatever it is,' some of them had reasoned, 'it is only right that you take the young lady home since it's already so late.' These were unfortunately returned with unnecessary insults from the enraged driver, who had given retorts like 'Who are you? Tony Blair?'.

I thought the issue was finally resolved when the operator finally secured a replacement booking for me, after which the driver flashed me a gleeful grin prior to driving off. In an uncanny coincidence the next day, I was harassed by an anonymous crank call, from a disturbingly familiar voice, making spitting noises into the phone.

I am rather shaken by the incident, having been hollered at in the presence of least 50 other passengers for something that had resulted from a mistake by the service provider. I was also deeply disgraced that many of the foreigners who had witnessed the scene would be taking away this episode as part of their memories of Singapore. Last, I find it very distressing to consider what other types of disturbances I may be subjected to in the aftermath of the incident, given that the cab driver now has my phone number.

Most of us are resigned to the inevitability of hikes in cab fares but I think it is only fair to consumers that the increments are matched by a commitment to raise or, in the very least, maintain a minimum level of service standards and integrity among staff.

Hopefully, the operators will not disappoint and respond that consumers would have to contribute to the retraining of staff by paying X amount more per Y km from whichever day moving forward. I am, by the way, still awaiting an explanation from SMRT with regard to this incident.

Ng Kian Pin (Ms)


http://www.straitstimes.com/ST%2BForum/Online%2BStory/STIStory_187787.html

Thursday, November 29, 2007

Yo! MDA raps


They say a picture paints a thousand words. A video, made up of 30 frames persecond, will speak volumes. MDA and creativity. This only pushes the point home that I have been trying to say all along. What creativity? Did you say the plagiarism in this video? And I have not even said anything yet about their horrible, no-rhyme rap! Thanks MDA for making Singapore feel ashamed.

Labels: , , ,

Saturday, November 24, 2007

The usual farce is on this week again. Yep, its Mediacorpse time!

They have it every year. They say it is for the radio industry. The so-called Singapore Radio Awards. However, this time, there was a write up in the Straits Times about this farce. How can it be the the Singapore Radio Awards when the awards are all about Mediacorp DJs and no others? Last I checked, there are other radio stations in Singapore besides Mediacorp. Plus, in order to get picked as a favourite, you need to vote for them via SMS and get this, you are CHARGED some money to vote. I have said it before and I will say it again. it is just not worth following. And the classic part? MDA states that this is snot part of their jurisdiction. So why do I pay them all that money every year? Just to fund local crappy shows like Eye For A Guy?

In any case, Mediacorp should name this awards presentation ceremony the Mediacorp Radio Awards. Oh and another thing. Just go to any Mediacorp employee and and say Mediacorp sucks and you will see that the employee will come to a stout defence of those Caldecott Media Folks. How pathetic can they get? They are brainwashed! And so will you be if you spend some of your hard-earned money voting for these idiots while Mediacorp laughs all the way to the bank. Be wise! Boycott this farce!

Labels: , , , , , ,

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Barang Barang service sucks

I trawl the local forum pages every morning and one such morning on September 12, I came across this gem. Having faced the poor service of Barang Barang before, I empathise with this person who posted this in the Straits Times Forum section. Here it is below, from the Straits Times Forum

Shoddy service over a table reserved during the Great Singapore Sale
DURING the Great Singapore Sale in mid-July, I was interested in a table I saw at Barang Barang, Marina Square, so I called to check if it was in stock.
It was not, but the salesperson took my name and phone number, told me that I could reserve it over the phone and they would call me when the stock arrives in late July.

By early August, there was still no call, so I called again, only to be told that July's shipment was insufficient to serve all customers on the waiting list. I was told to wait for the September shipment.

A few days later, I went to the store to confirm that my reservation had indeed been registered. Another salesperson assured me that it was, and I would still be entitled to the sale price even though the shipment would arrive only after the sale period.

As there was still no call by Sept 8, I went straight to the shop, only to find out that both salespeople who had previously attended to me had resigned and that the computer had no record of my reservation.

What's more, the new salesperson said it is company policy that reservations without pre-payment will not be honoured and that the salespeople who had attended to me must have misinformed me.

Upset at the inconsistent information and service, I requested to speak to the manager to sort things out, but was curtly told that the manager was 'off' and that he would not speak to me.

I was taken aback by this response, but when my repeated attempts to see the manager failed, I left extremely disappointed. As a reputable, service-oriented company, is this kind of service acceptable by Barang Barang management?

Chew Kuok Hsin


So Mr Chew, do what I did. Find the name and address of the Barang Barang owner and write him, telling him about the poor service. It is not that difficult to find him. That will get these assholes to give proper service next time.

Tuesday, July 24, 2007

I told you Sony Vaio notebooks suck

I saw this in the forum page of the Straits Times today. Seems that this is not the only person who thinks that Sony Vaio laptops (and not to mention their after-sales service) suck. I do not think many people will be buying a Sony laptop after this.

July 24, 2007
Laptops and dedicated graphic memory: Consumers have a right to know what they are paying for

I BOUGHT a Sony Vaio laptop VGN-SZ48GN in March, but it took me some months to discover that I am not getting what I have paid for.

I was told, during the sales transaction, that this high-end laptop has a dedicated graphic memory of 128MB but, to my dismay, it has only a mere 64MB memory.

And there is no detailed information on the specifications of the product on Sony's website and its printed brochures. Only the total memory, which includes the Dedicated Video Memory, System Video Memory and Shared System Memory, is stated.

After a few e-mail exchanges with Sony's Customer Contact Centre, I had a conversation over the phone with Sony's Customer Contact Centre Section Leader, Mr Chiou Bing Han.

He said that it had always been Sony's ongoing practice, which has been around for years, to not disclose the actual dedicated memory on the graphic card.

In another e-mail reply, he said Sony had been rightful in complying to the new Windows Vista classification of graphics memory, which is contradictory to what he said previously because Windows Vista was only launched in January 2007.

To highlight my point, there was a recent roadshow by Harvey Norman at Millennia Walk and the same laptop model was displayed with a promotional tag stating it has a dedicated graphic memory of 128MB. On further enquiry, the salesperson said his colleague has misprinted the tags.

I believe that consumers deserve a right to know what they are paying for. Sony's way of practice is not transparent, misleading consumers and ironically their authorised dealers too.

Kwan Ching Leong

Tuesday, June 19, 2007

Mediacorp has creativity? Well dog my cats!

Just saw some advertisement on TV by Mediacorp Singapore (you know, the usual, doing some self-praise, like they always do) and it ends up with the slogan "Mediacorp...where creativity blossoms" I could not help but laugh at this. Waitaminute. Creativity? Mediacorp? You mean someone had the gumption to put these two words in the same sentence? What creativity? Hmmm...lets see...there was The Dancefloor, which was modelled after So You Think You Can Dance? Then there was (and still is) the logo for Channelnewsasia which looked like it was ripped from Adobe, The Pyramid game and so forth. So in what way does copying and aping mean creativity? And does it really blossom at Mediacorp? I fear (like I have always know) that they are the victim of a gigantic hoax. Gosh Mediacorp, do yourselves a favour. Don't shoot yourselves in the foot. Think about that. Creativity. Bah!

Friday, May 11, 2007

Thasevi food centre are money-faced bastards



Yep. You heard me. Went there and ordered a few things from them and we were told we had to pay for the fish curry. Can you believe it? All we wanted was the curry, not the fish meat mind you, just the curry and if we wanted it, we had to pay for it. Wrong thing to do buster. You assholes are getting too big for your britches. Time I chose somewhere else to eat prata.